mps vi mice model (Jackson Laboratory)
Structured Review

Mps Vi Mice Model, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mps+vi+mice+model/pmc10694777-52-33-69?v=Jackson+Laboratory
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Reduction of lysosome abundance and GAG accumulation after odiparcil treatment in MPS I and MPS VI models"
Article Title: Reduction of lysosome abundance and GAG accumulation after odiparcil treatment in MPS I and MPS VI models
Journal: Molecular Genetics and Metabolism Reports
doi: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2023.101011
Figure Legend Snippet: Lysotracker visualization of lysosomes in MPS I and MPS VI fibroblasts and effect of odiparcil treatment. A. Representative images of lysotracker labelling in healthy (control) and MPS I fibroblasts. B, C. Quantification of fluorescence of lysotracker in control and MPS I (B) or MPS VI (C) fibroblasts. D, E. Representative images of MPS VI (D) or MPS I (E) fibroblasts treated with vehicle (DMSO) or odiparcil. F, G. Quantification of fluorescence of lysotracker after odiparcil treatment in MPS VI (F) or MPS I (G) fibroblasts, normalized to the DMSO vehicle control. Data is presented as mean ± SEM. Groups were statistically analysed using a one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 compared to non-affected or DMSO controls (as indicated).
Techniques Used: Control, Fluorescence
Figure Legend Snippet: GAG Quantification in Tissues from MPS VI and MPS I mice treated with odiparcil. A, B. CS, DS and HS quantification in extracts from liver (A) and eye (B) of WT control, Arsb- control and Arsb- mice treated with the indicated dose of odiparcil (g odiparcil per kg diet); C, D. CS, DS and HS quantification in extracts from liver (C) and eye (D) of WT control, Idua- control and Idua- mice treated with the indicated dose of odiparcil (g odiparcil per kg diet); Data is presented as mean ± SEM. Groups were statistically analysed using a one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 compared to WT or Arsb − or Idua- controls (as indicated).
Techniques Used: Control
